Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1224

reference
748-tree-1
name
1224
tree-preservation-order

undefined

748-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.008162 50.883957)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.008119 50.883953,-1.008121 50.883961,-1.008127 50.883969,-1.008137 50.883975,-1.008148 50.883979,-1.008161 50.883980,-1.008175 50.883979,-1.008187 50.883975,-1.008196 50.883969,-1.008202 50.883962,-1.008205 50.883953,-1.008203 50.883945,-1.008197 50.883938,-1.008188 50.883932,-1.008176 50.883928,-1.008163 50.883926,-1.008149 50.883927,-1.008137 50.883931,-1.008128 50.883937,-1.008122 50.883944,-1.008119 50.883953)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL